[OM] Re: DOF question

[Chuck Norcutt]

I only know about the 150 years of photographic history and the 
physiological and geometric reasons for same.  I don't know about no 
pixel peeper interpretation.

Chuck Norcutt

AG Schnozz wrote:
> Dr Flash wrote:
>> I guess you don't intend to tell us?  :-)
> 
> Why? What would it accomplish?  I figure that there are two schools
> of thought about DoF, one of which is based in 150 years of
> photographic history and the other based on pixel-peeping.  No matter
> which opinion I spew forth will be trounced on by the purveyers of
> the opposite thought.

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================