Subject: | [OM] Re: DOF question |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:34:43 -0700 (PDT) |
Dr Flash wrote: > I guess you don't intend to tell us? :-) Why? What would it accomplish? I figure that there are two schools of thought about DoF, one of which is based in 150 years of photographic history and the other based on pixel-peeping. No matter which opinion I spew forth will be trounced on by the purveyers of the opposite thought. AG __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: DOF question, Richard Ociepka |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Test, Martyn Smoothy |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: DOF question, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: DOF question, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |