On 4/13/07, Walters, Martin <mwalters@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Here's one for AG at least, though others can weigh in. One of our
> remaining bricks-and-mortar camera stores has a silver-nosed 24/2.8. It
> seems to be in mint condition, based on a very quick look and the price
> is OK by Canadian standards, particularly for a store (and one I should
> support, all things being equal).
>
> Now Gary's tests didn't show a great deal of difference between SC and
> MC 24/2.8s. As a potential Zuiko rescue operation may be shaping up
> (store also has a pretty nice looking OM4 and a couple of 50/3.5
> macros), I'd be grateful for any comments experience with early 24s.
>
>
> Should I apologize now for another on-topic posting?
>
> Martin
I have an SC 24/2.8 though not AG-schnozzed, as well as a minty MC
version. The SC is well-brassed and even a little sloppy, but the
little bugger's a performer. I think I like it in a lot of ways
better than the other, newer one. I wouldn't hesitate if it fills a
gap for you.
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|