Subject: | [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:38:43 -0700 (PDT) |
Dan Mitchell wrote: > I actually spent time as part of my job looking very closely at > jpegs a few years ago and tweaking quality settings for the task > at hand -- which has resulted in an unfortunate oversensitivity to > jpeg artefacts in everyday use.. Likewise, I cannot stand most direct-satellite broadcast because of the excessive MPEG compression not only on the video stream, but on the audio stream. But it's "digital" so it's "better". Right? AG-analog retrogrouch-Schnozz (lest you think I'm totally retrogrouchy, my recording studio gear and instruments are almost 100% digital) ____________________________________________________________________________________ Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Dan Mitchell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OT: Re: Re: Superwide lenses - advice, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Dan Mitchell |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Doug Smith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |