ML Archiv: [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth

Subject:	[OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth
From:	Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 08 Apr 2007 19:59:59 -0700

So as a practical rule, should I first convert the out-of-camera jpg to 
a psd or tif and as A. Alces says, convert to 16 bit before editing?

Mike

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, (continued) [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, chucknorcutt [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Andrew Wiese [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, chucknorcutt [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Andrew Wiese [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, chucknorcutt [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Andrew Wiese [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Moose [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, chucknorcutt [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, AG Schnozz [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Mike <= [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Moose [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Richard Ociepka [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Richard Ociepka [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Dan Mitchell [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, AG Schnozz [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Dan Mitchell

Previous by Date:	[OM] In body IS, was: On Fred Miranda.., chucknorcutt
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: (somewhat OT) Minolta scanner film carriers, Bill Pearce
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, AG Schnozz
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Bill Pearce
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]