Jan, thanks for the explanation. My system is not a Mac which may be
why I didn't recognize how it is done.
And the quote from 'W' that was included with your response? Even
*more* depressing. I'm going to have an extra tall OJ this morning.
Sigh.
ScottGee1
On 3/24/07, Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Jan, I may have to stop reading the quotes in your sig -- this one is
> > particularly depressing!
>
> Sorry about that. I'm trying to focus on more empowering ones, but
> they seem to draw the most ire.
>
> > BTW, I assume the variations are automated . . .
>
> Mac OS X Mail. "Preferences... --> Signatures --> Choose Signature:
> At Random". But you can defeat that for when the fog lifts long
> enough for you to recall a particularly apropos nugget.
>
> :::: Because the -- all which is on the table begins to address the
> big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculated, for
> example, is on the table. Whether or not benefits rise based upon
> wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the
> formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those
> different cost drivers, affecting those -- changing those with
> personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more
> likely to be -- or closer delivered to that has been promised. Does
> that make any sense to you? -- George W. Bush ::::
> :::: Jan Steinman http://www.VeggieVanGogh.com ::::
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|