> From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Jan, I may have to stop reading the quotes in your sig -- this one is
> particularly depressing!
Sorry about that. I'm trying to focus on more empowering ones, but
they seem to draw the most ire.
> BTW, I assume the variations are automated . . .
Mac OS X Mail. "Preferences... --> Signatures --> Choose Signature:
At Random". But you can defeat that for when the fog lifts long
enough for you to recall a particularly apropos nugget.
:::: Because the -- all which is on the table begins to address the
big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculated, for
example, is on the table. Whether or not benefits rise based upon
wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the
formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those
different cost drivers, affecting those -- changing those with
personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more
likely to be -- or closer delivered to that has been promised. Does
that make any sense to you? -- George W. Bush ::::
:::: Jan Steinman http://www.VeggieVanGogh.com ::::
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|