Whoops, sorry. Missed the allusion. My excuse is that I approached
the story from the view of Mr Johnson, one of history's great
curmudgeons.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 11/03/2007, at 6:18 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> You're so literal. Block of wood. P1. (Not funny enough to
> explain.)
>
> Yes, it was Berkeley, whose scheme wouldn't have been conceivable
> without the ontological proof as backdrop.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|