I haven't had enough to drink to get through all of this Andrew.
I'll need the Cliff notes or I'll wait for the movie to come out.
Jay
>All right, here we go -
>
>The ontological proof of the existence of the P1 -
>
>1. It is possible to conceive of a camera that is better than the one
>that you now own, in every way.
>
>2. It follows then that you can conceive of a camera even better than
>that one - and one better again.
<snip>
<snip>
<and a lot more snip>
>or
>5. Thus we must be thinking about something, a 'P1' that exists in
>some form, even if only as a shared meaning.
>Conclusion: 'P1' must exist in some form.
>
>Andrew Fildes
>afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>'If a man speaks in the forest and there is no woman there to hear
>him, is he still wrong?'
>>On 10/03/2007, at 4:17 AM, NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> If a camera was introduced in the woods, but nobody was there to see
>> it, is there any doubt that Olympus USA had something to do with it?
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|