Funniest response I saw on this lens by Mike Johnston:
"I mean, really. A 3-inch square, 18-ounce lens to cover a sensor
that's 13.5 x 18mm? To put you in context, if this lens covered
4x5 ,and was proportional, it would be as big as a watermelon.
A big watermelon."
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Mar 8, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Bernard Frangoulis wrote:
>
> Sure. But personally I would much prefer a less luminous (f/2.0),
> but smaller lens.
>
> A short commentary on the lens on this very good blog:
> http://www.auspiciousdragon.net/fourthirds/?p=191
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|