While I do not have the 2710 I do have the crappy 2700 and here are two
sample scans done from both scanners
same picture two scanners
2700 scan
http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/613944#134713089-L-LB
v700 scan
http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/613944#134713286-L-LB
and here original size - warning large files and sorry I didn't scan
both at same resolution but I didn't know I was going to have to compare
them ;-)
2700 scan
http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/613944#134713089-O-LB
v700 scan http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/613944#134713286-O-LB
here is a gallery with v700 scans
http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/1277283 all with no post
processing.
on the whole I am very pleased with the scanner although it failed at 10
months old and had to be sent back and the motherboard replaced. There
is a compay that does wet mounting kits for it.
IanW
John Gettis wrote:
>
> I was wondering if anyone had used both of these. I was interested in
> wether or not the v-700 was as good as some of the dedicated film scanners.
> as those are getting harder to come by. I have the 2710 and have been
> happy with the results. But am in the process of replacing a ailing
> flatbed scanner and if it is as good as the 2710 that would be one less
> thing on the desk. Plus Xp support from canon was not there and it was
> only through this list that I was able to get it to work, My next computer
> may not have a slot open for the scsi card and I think that getting it to
> work with Vista is out of the question.
> thanks
> John Gettis
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|