Subject: | [OM] Re: Bellows |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:54:30 -0500 |
A dual cable release would only be of value to you if the lens is on an OM body. One leg of the cable will release the OM's shutter and the other will close down the lens to shooting aperture. It's not of much use though with an OM lens and bellows on an E-330. With that sort of rig everything will be manual. Reversing the lens may be desirable when the distance to the subject is less than the distance to the sensor. It has to do with the way lenses are designed which expects the object distance from the front of the lens to be greater than the image distance behind the lens. In close-up photography these normal object/image distance relationships may get reversed... ergo reverse the lens to compensate unless it's a special macro lens to begin with. If you get serious about this stuff this is a book you should own: <http://www.amazon.com/John-Shaws-Closeups-Nature-Shaw/dp/0817440526/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-3192476-2323027?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1173145846&sr=8-1> Shaw uses Nikon gear but the principles are the same and the gear is similar. Chuck Norcutt NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote: > Without doing all your > homework for you, I would say the Olympus unit allows you to use a dual > cable > release and also to reverse your lens on the bellows. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Reviews of E-410 and E-510, Larry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Sensors of E-400 and E-410 to be compared?, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Bellows, Allen Coltrin |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Bellows, Allen Coltrin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |