I don't know. It seems to me that the people who reject all the
science about global warming also reject the science that the earth
is more than 6000 years old.
As for population, criticizing the the exact rate prediction while
watching the number reach 6 billion really seems to be the
controversial part.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Feb 26, 2007, at 4:17 AM, Wayne Culberson wrote:
> Yes, it's definitely controversial. And definitely crap IMO. I'm
> old enough
> to remember when they were prophesying (1970's) we had to "act now"
> because
> all the pollution we were producing was blocking the sun and
> dangerously
> cooling the earth. Then there was the prophecies of "population
> explosion"
> that would leave us without standing room on earth by about the
> year 2000.
> Of course Al Gore will never have to answer for his ridiculous
> predictions
> either, as he knows he'll be long gone by then, meanwhile laughing
> all the
> way to the bank.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|