So, I am trying to find out how my Tokina stacks up against other 80-200
lens's. Misha had nothing to gain and everything to lose by telling me it
was a good lens, since I already had it.
I have no idea where he got his data and would like to find out what it was
he used to look it up while we were on the phone.
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Chuck Norcutt
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:12 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: New Person to the group
I'm referring to Tokina and Phoenix lenses in general. I have no
knowledge of the particular lenses you're talking about. As I said,
there is significant variation within brands and lens lines within
brands. My main point is that store fellas (them what works for
commissions) are not to be trusted for buying advice. Get your advice
elsewhere where there are no conflicts of interest. Holds true for cars
and everything else you buy as well. Lenses are not unique in that respect.
The collective knowledge on this list is worth 10,000 store fellas and
is 100,000 times more reliable.
Chuck Norcutt
Scott Peden wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> So the basis of the question is, Where can I go to check lens's out
myself?
> You have different information on the Tokina Lens that I have which the
> online store persons told me was an award winner in '78?
>
> Or are you referring to the Phoenix Fish eye, or just the phoenix lens's
in
> particular that the brick and mortar store person told me about.
>
> Scott
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Chuck Norcutt
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 5:42 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: New Person to the group
>
> Fire your camera store fella. In most camera stores the best performing
> lens of all time is whatever they happen to have in stock.
>
> Lens brands are a first good indication of quality but, as in all
> things, there may be significant performance variation within the line
> and even between samples. Zuikos are generally excellent lenses but not
> all of them. There are a few duds in the OM lineup. Tokina and Phoenix
> are very different horses. Tokina is an old line Japanese optical
> company which designs and manufactures its own lenses. Phoenix is a
> marketing company which sources a limited set of low cost lenses
> wherever they can get them. Some perform very well for the price.
> Others not so hot.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Scott Peden wrote:
>>
>> A Camera store fella, Close Focus, Misha, told me, when I first got
> started,
>> that my Tokina EMZ 820 80-200 mm F -4 Y/CX for Yashica FR. Contax won an
>> award the year it came out, 1978. It is OK, it just isn't near enough
> Zoom,
>> and I have a 4/3rds adaptor for it, but can't use any of the 2 or 3 X
>> teleconverters, as the ones I have are OM's.
>>
>> And I have heard that Tokina may be a good lens, but like the Phoenix,
> their
>> Fish eye's are suppose to be good, stay away from the rest of their stuff
>> (my brick and mortar store told me that).
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|