I think what Moose was referring to is that many of your replies are
almost unreadable... just a stream of undifferentiated text. Here's
what I see on the list. You need to re-wrap or somehow modify whatever
your response procedure is if you expect people to read your responses.
Chuck Norcutt
Allen Coltrin wrote:
> Huh?
>
>> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:54:42 -0800> From: olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> To:
>> olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [OM] Re: New Person to the group> > Allen
>> Coltrin wrote:> > That list is exactly what I needed to see. It takes away
>> all the uncertanty.> > > > Allen> > You guys actually are cool. :)> > >
>> Thanks. So what have you done to your replies so that they are now >
>> indigestible stream of consciousness, without breaks?> > Moose> >
>> ==============================================> List usage info:
>> http://www.zuikoholic.com> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ==============================================
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live™ Messenger 8.1 is here! Download now.
> http://g.msn.com/8reen_us/EN/INSTALL_MSN_MESSENGER_DL.EXE
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|