Thanks. I'll have to give it a go. Your FS4000 has IR dust removal.
Any comment on dust with the 5D and slide copier solution?
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> I prefer the roll-over image because it's a little less grainy although
>> it doesn't have quite as much contrast. As a practical matter there's
>> almost nothing to choose between them.
> I agree. The initial image is from the FS4000 film scanner and the
> roll-over is the 5D/80/4 shot.
>
> What's interesting is that the 5D image has been upsampled almost 30% to
> match the FS4000 output. I haven't tried the other direction yet.
>> Both could benefit by a little bit of post processing which would likely
>> make them indistinguishable from one another.
>>
> Yup
>> I assume you're having to use a short extension tube on the 5D so that
>> the bellows can clear the pentaprism hump in front. I haven't tried it
>> yet but thought that additional extension might be problematic in making
>> a 1:1 image using the 50/3.5 with bellows and slide duplicator... might
>> not be possible to get *down* to 1:1. I can see where your 80/4 with
>> its longer focal length would be immune from the over-magnification
>> problem if it exists.
> Doesn't exist. The slide duplicator bellows is barely long enough to do
> 1:1, otherwise, everything is broadly adjustable. I used the Oly 7mm
> extension tube, but one could use a longer one, just shorten the bellows
> extension by an equal amount. No problem at all.
>
> Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|