> ...There goes the price of the 24/2.8.
> Interestingly, in other tests, both 21mm and the 18mm zuikos do
> extremely well.
My own emperical evidence shows that the 24/2.8 is one very fine
performer. I am very pleased with it on the E-1. However, the real
sleeper in the bunch is the 35/2.8. This particular lens produces
some of the most incredible bokeh and pleasing images. For B&W
digital conversions, I much prefer the images from the 24/2.8 and
35/2.8 than the DZ lenses.
It is nice to see how well the lowly 24/2.8 does hold up to Canon's
greatest. I'd expect the Canon lens to outperform--duh, but the
Zuiko held its own rather nicely. Even where it was a "dog" it was
still pretty decent.
AG
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|