Hi, Joel,
I agree that zoom lens is more convenient. I always take my 35-80/2.8
to my China trip. Honestly to say, it's quiet heavy when you belong
it with camera & motor. Recently, I got an OM-1n. The motor fails to
work properly with the OM-1n. Therefore, I don't think it's a good
balance to put my 35-80/2.8 onto my OM-1n without motor. As my idea,
a light combination for my hiking photography as OM-1n without motor,
24/2, 35/2, 50/1.2 & 85/2.
Any idea for it?
---
Michael
Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user
在 21 Jan 2007 12:56 PM 時，Joel Wilcox 寫到：
>
> On 1/20/07, Brian Swale <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have to say the thought crossed my mind that if I were lucky
>> enough to own
>> a 35-80/2.8 Zuiko, I would be using it at least sometimes,
>> including when
>> hiking, and if I thought it seemed too heavy, I'd be off to a
>> gymnasium to
>> build up some strength :-))
>
> Truth be told, the 85/2 did not get quite the use once the 35-80 was
> in my bag. It breaks some rules, but the zoom works well with a
> little extension too.
>
> Joel W.
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|