An alternative might be the 35-80/2.8, but the chances of getting one of those
is just about nill. I'm thinking about locking mine up in the safe. :-)
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman)
> Guess I missed that.
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Tom Fenwick" <super.wide@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > He implied that he already has both the 100/2 and the 90/2. He's working
> > his way down.
> >
> >
> > On 19/01/07, Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > A 90/2 is bigger and weighs 10 more ounces, but how much does that matter?
> > > And it does macro down to 2:1 without accessories and is a great lens. Of
> > > course, you'll probably have a better chance of finding an 85 than a 90.
> > > Mine is staying here for sure.
> > >
> > > Walt
> > >
> >
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|