Thanks, Chuck. I can see now that you should be able to see either
the apex or only one path. At the time I was so taken with the trees
that I lost my way ...
This is the way for me to improve: to show others and suffer the
embarrassment, even if it is only private, of seeing poorly composed
or set up images.
Chris
On 2 Jan 2007, at 12:39, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Very nice. 7, 10, 12, 15 and 20 have caught my attention. 7 is my
> favorite of all. I think it might have been a bit better if the
> apex of
> the triangle formed by the path intersection had been included but
> that's a minor point. I also recognize that I might decide
> otherwise if
> I could actually see it framed that way. 10 is my next choice. The
> light is delectable. 20 has caught my attention since I've frequently
> tried similar photographs of a single tree and they almost never
> seem to
> work out. The light definitely makes this one work. Well done.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Chris Barker wrote:
>> Well, keeping faith with what I promised Michael Collins, here is my
>> first hack at a new website for 2007. I have left a couple of dogs
>> in the collection so that others can learn from my mistakes. Mainly,
>> choose your aperture carefully and don't just pop away with what you
>> had set last time. If you look at the settings you will see that I
>> had f3.5 set too often and the DOF suffered ... I'll remove the dogs
>> in due course as I force myself to improve.
>>
>> www.threeshoes.net/photography/ang-abbey/
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|