I decided on Aperture after all, and not wait for LightRoom It has a
less cluttered desktop than LR and I really like the output options.
It is also quite speedy on both my MacBook (Core Duo) and iMac (Core
2 Duo). I should have liked it to have some of the features of
LightRoom, such as holding down the Alt key while dragging Exposure
and Shadows to show the blown highlights or blocked-up shadows, but
it is possible that they are in there somewhere ...
Thanks for the prompt, Ian.
Chris
On 8 Dec 2006, at 11:23, swisspace wrote:
> Forget previous versions of both and download the latest. The
> libraries
> add about 10 percent to the disk space used if you build the previews
> for both products, but with disk space cheap the rewards in
> performance
> outweigh that for me.
>
> I find they work fine on the macbook, using a mini 120gb hard drive
> - at
> the moment I have two one with the photos (11,500 mostly ORF)
> lightroom
> library on the other one with photos and aperture.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|