Yes and no; as posted it was a pretty accurate representation, but it was
painted/drizzled/splattered. I wasn't over keen on the original; the photo
is quite a small portion of the painting...
Tom
On 10/12/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong but I viewed the horse as a chalk drawing which
> meant the original would have had a rather flat look. That's why I
> preferred your original to Moose's jazzed up version. But if you tell
> me that is was a painting and Moose's looks more like the original then
> I'll change my view. Just my particular bias to keep things looking
> more or less like real life... except, of course, beautiful, young 60
> year olds who want to look a few years younger. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|