Subject: | [OM] Re: Busting a myth |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Dec 2006 06:49:54 -0800 (PST) |
Chuck wrote: > ps: Although I believe the gradual uprez thing is a myth I Probably my best uprez results have been from a three-step resize. I just make sure that all three are at a different ratio. This reduces the aliasing that occures with converging diagonal lines. I've also done a sharpening in the midst of a resize too with great results. PWP's uprez engine is pretty good but does choke on diagonals. AG ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: E-330 price drop, John Hermanson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] What would you do? UPDATE, Daniel Sepke |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Busting a myth, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Ooops..bought something, R S |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |