Moose wrote:
Here's a different version of my comparison that shows the differences
more easily by using overlaid images. Works with FireFox and Netscape,
but not IE
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Process/UpSample/Uprez.htm>.
Moose
Moose wrote:
> I did the same thing Butzi did (but only posted it here) - except I
> did it with a practical image of the sort of thing I photograph, not a
> test chart.
>
> And I didn't do the stepwise interpolation myself. I used FM's Stair
> Interpolation Pro, which is for any image, and FM Resize Pro for the
> camera it was taken with, a 300D.
>
> The results spoke for themselves for me. I don't know if FM does
> anything beyond simple 10% stepwise interpolation, but it works better
> than any of the three PS bicubic options for me.
>
> And the camera specific Resize Pro is even better
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Process/UpSample/resize.htm>.
>
> Be sure to look at the noise in the shadows on the slicker, as well as
> the hat creases, cheek and gloves. The RP versions don't look uprezed
> to me.
>
> If I ever have to uprez a 5D image, I'll be getting Resize Pro for it.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|