ScottGee1 wrote:
> Yeah, I guess I can understand that. No parts available . . . never
> well known to the general public . . . it adds up and provides those
> of us in the know with the option of buying some very fine optics for
> very little $$. I still miss the 105/2.8 I used when I shot N!kon.
>
My OM mount version is very fine. But not quite up to the EF mount
Tamron 90/2.8 Di at either 1:2 or 1:1. Doubt if you would see the
difference in any normal sized print, though.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|