Yeah, I guess I can understand that. No parts available . . . never
well known to the general public . . . it adds up and provides those
of us in the know with the option of buying some very fine optics for
very little $$. I still miss the 105/2.8 I used when I shot N!kon.
I wouldn't be surprised if Kino is happily fulfilling private
contracts for other companies and relieved to be free of marketing
their own.
ScottGee1
On 12/4/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Unfortunately, no. $30 is about par for a Kiron zoom these days.
> Something rarer or in exceptionally good condition might bring $40 or
> even $50. Other than new the price has never reflected the quality of
> the glass or the build.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> ScottGee1 wrote:
>
> > It went for $28. Does that qualify as a demi-Fang?
> >
> > ScottGee1
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|