Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] Eps*n V700, was Zuiko 16mm fisheye...how much veiling glare should I expect |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:02:05 +1100 |
> > Speaking of which, I am in the market for a scanner, probably > a V700, > to replace my Epson Photo 2450 in scanning 645 film. Has anyone > (preferably in the UK) bought one and regretted not waiting for a > V750? Is this person now ready to sell it to me? ;-) > Please get one soon Chris, I'd really like to hear how the V700 works in comparison to the 2450. I have a 2450 and I'd like to upgrade but don't want to jump without good justification ! ...Wayne ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: What would you do? Now: Horse racing and dog. Well sort of . . ., Ian Nichols |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: What would you do? Now: Horse racing and dog. Well sort of . . ., Manuel Viet |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Eps*n V700, was Zuiko 16mm fisheye...how much veiling glare should I expect, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Eps*n V700, was Zuiko 16mm fisheye...how much veiling glare should I expect, Chris Barker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |