Like you, Keith, I was a bit peeved when Apple went over to the dark
side
with Intel, but having owned my MacBook for 6 mos. now, I can tell
you these
chips work great.
Besides, the Intel migration is a done deal. 'Nuff said, so to speak,
as far asSteve Jobs
is concerned.
-Stephen
On Nov 20, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Listar wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:26:34 -0800
> From: keith_w <keith_w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [OM] Re: **SPAM** Re: iMac for Workflow
>
> Tom Scales wrote:
>> That was my point. There is no Intel compiled version for the Mac
>> yet and
>> they've said CS2 never will be.
>
> Which brings up a thought or two...
> I have no need for a Windows OS on my Mac, and will very likely
> never do
> so, so why would I even want an Intel Mac?
> My understanding of Mac's plans for the future mean they are never
> going
> to offer a NON-Intel Mac again. They'll all have the Intel chip in
> them.
>
> I suppose it doesn't matter ~ maybe ~ as if I do get an Intel Mac
> sometime in the future, that doesn't mean I MUST install a Windows
> OS on
> it, does it.
> So, maybe I'm concerned unnecessarily.
> Still, it sits uneasily on me.
> I don't WANT an Intel chip, but all future Macs will [reported ly] be
> supplied with them...
>
> Dialog?
>
> keith whaley
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|