I agree that the low magnification should make it relatively easy to
design something with little impact on optical quality. But, since I've
never heard anything good about these adapters I have to think that the
current implementations leave something to be desired.
Chuck Norcutt
Tim Hughes wrote:
> I totally agree with Chuck here.
>
> However just for completeness, pop-photo did do a test of some of these low
> power adapters meant
> for correcting flange mount differences and found the loss of quality
> surprisingly little (on film
> cameras). The particular test I remember was for a M42 mount with a slightly
> smaller change in
> F.L., but likely not too different. Their comment was that the adapter lens
> was essentially so
> thin that apart from the extra reflecting surfaces, it had little effect on
> quality.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|