I am too. It sounds impressive. I tried one of the earlier models
with the punctuation in the name and it felt very nice in the hand.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Nov 4, 2006, at 8:26 PM, Moose wrote:
> I'm curious about the K10D. Since he's not doing the E-400, I hope
> that's what Phil is testing now. On a pure actually useful feature
> basis, it stands out from all the rest in, and even somewhat above,
> its
> price/mp category. On paper, it's what many of us would like to have
> come from Oly. 10mp, body based IS, dustbuster, weather sealing, RAW
> development and some new and useful sounding exposure modes, including
> flexible auto iso with user set limits.
>
> If they got the sensor system right, this could easily be the
> choice for
> someone without a big investment in C or N system components either
> starting into digital or switching.Take a look at the features here,
> lots of really desirable stuff
> <http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pentaxk10d/>. And they have some
> interesting glass and can use oodles of old glass.
>
> If the sensor stuff doesn't deliver? Oh well, another boat anchor. But
> if I were looking to switch from the E-series, I wouldn't jump before
> seeing what the K10D can do.
>
> Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|