C*non 24-105/4 + 100-400/4.5-5.6 ?
Probably DOF options would be as good with the FF C*non as the Zuiko
due to the format size. C*non has the ISO advantage, so exposure
shouldn't be an issue.
Oh ... there was a mention of actually being able to carry the lenses.
OK advantage to the Zuikos. Actually the 24-105 doesn't look too bad
for weight.
-jeff
On 10/12/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You're right about only two lenses for the equivalent of 28-400 and both
> are 2.8-3.5 so they're pretty good on speed. I had gotten used to doing
> the equivalent of 28-200 with the Minolta A1's 2.8-3.5 lens. I thought
> long and hard about this weight and lens change issue before throwing in
> the towel on 4/3's.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> John Gettis wrote:
>
> > I feel the same way about the E-500. I like the fact that I can carry the
> > camera and 2 lenses and be covered from 28mm-400mm. I don't think you can
> > do that with any other system and have the lenses speed the Olympus lenses
> > have. Now I could be wrong on that but don't think so Just my 2 cents
> > worth
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|