If I had to make a living from my photography I would not be nearly as
overweight as I am. I enjoy it but everything I do seems flawed to me. /jmac
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Jeff Keller
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:54 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: How does digital photography change cameras and
photography?
On 10/12/06, Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
snipe>
If 100 very good pictures are posted, most people will still find 10
that they like quite a bit more than the others. No matter how good
they are, some will be prefered. A skilled pro is just someone who can
create the prefered ones reliably enough to earn a living. If someone
has a "good eye", they don't need to know much about how the tools
work to create very good images. That's the way it should be with a
good tool. I've been surprised with how good many of the photos posted
on flickr are ... and how many "pros" there are ;-)
Think about this list. The most prolific poster of very high quality
photos seldom talks about the tools. I don't believe GB earns a living
as a photographer either.
Some people are fascinated playing with the tools. Some are fascinated
with the results of the tools. Both can provide valuable results.
-jeff
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|