I have a pro photographer friend who is so non-technical with respect to
all things related to photo equipment that I sometimes marvel that she's
able to change a battery or turn the camera on. But she takes great
photos. Wish I was 1/2 as good.
Chuck Norcutt
Jeff Keller wrote:
>
> If 100 very good pictures are posted, most people will still find 10
> that they like quite a bit more than the others. No matter how good
> they are, some will be prefered. A skilled pro is just someone who can
> create the prefered ones reliably enough to earn a living. If someone
> has a "good eye", they don't need to know much about how the tools
> work to create very good images. That's the way it should be with a
> good tool. I've been surprised with how good many of the photos posted
> on flickr are ... and how many "pros" there are ;-)
>
> Think about this list. The most prolific poster of very high quality
> photos seldom talks about the tools. I don't believe GB earns a living
> as a photographer either.
>
> Some people are fascinated playing with the tools. Some are fascinated
> with the results of the tools. Both can provide valuable results.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|