On 10/12/06, Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > The problem with digital photography is that it reduces the
> > incremental cost of taking a photograph to essentially
> > nothing. The photographer thus has zero motivation for paying
> > any attention to what he's doing.
> >
>
> Yeah, a bloke at work was "lecturing" to me yesterday. It went something
> like this "soon there will be no professional photographers as it's so easy
> for anybody to just keep pressing the button until the picture comes out
> right". My immediate thought was of the thousand monkeys on typewriters
> that would eventually write all the works of Shakespeare - won't happen,
> they'll just produce endless garbage, something about entropy I reckon.
>
> ...Wayne
>
If 100 very good pictures are posted, most people will still find 10
that they like quite a bit more than the others. No matter how good
they are, some will be prefered. A skilled pro is just someone who can
create the prefered ones reliably enough to earn a living. If someone
has a "good eye", they don't need to know much about how the tools
work to create very good images. That's the way it should be with a
good tool. I've been surprised with how good many of the photos posted
on flickr are ... and how many "pros" there are ;-)
Think about this list. The most prolific poster of very high quality
photos seldom talks about the tools. I don't believe GB earns a living
as a photographer either.
Some people are fascinated playing with the tools. Some are fascinated
with the results of the tools. Both can provide valuable results.
-jeff
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|