You didn't catch my points of poor lens and scanner selection. Ok, it was a
Canon, it must be good.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 1:00 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Bad attitudes and Olympus Rants
>A similar problem cropped up in the 28mm lens test I conducted (or tried
> to) recently. The cropped section from one lens looked decidedly less
> crisp than from another lens. But it was probably my poor technique in
> processing the raw images. When looking at the JPEG's processed by the
> camera the situation was reversed.
>
> In any case my eyes are obviously different. When I look at Reichmann's
> test of the D30 and Provia scan I don't see any real differences other
> than color and a bit of contrast and, perhaps signfificant, some
> mottling of the image due to grain. I sometimes think people interpret
> grain as detail. Sorry, but I guess I prefer "plastic".
>
> Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|