For the Italy shots, they are done at almost the same time, there was no
lighting different. Ok, here again:
http://www.accura.com.hk/P8193517.jpg (1.1MB, 11mm at F4, 1/800s, E-1)
http://www.accura.com.hk/P_06.jpg (3.2MB, 21/2 at F5.6, OM4 auto)
To make it easier, just look at the halogen lamps inside the FARMACIA, there
is HUGE different between the film and digital shot.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Winsor Crosby"
>
> Part of the problem in looking at the images is the long time period
> between them and the change in the appearance of even the surfaces of
> the buildings. I had a similar problem with a comparison you
> presented in Italy, I believe, in which the lighting was different
> enough to obscure the difference between the film and digital media,
> that is the difference you pointed out could as easily been the
> result of lighting differences.
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, CA
> USA
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
