It is waste of time to talk about print to print compare, there is clear
pixel to pixel web view comparision why not use it? Anything went to print
is incomparable due to the printing technique, you do not know where the
bottle neck is, just like using a low resolution lens to compare the
resolution of film and digital.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:58 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Bad attitudes and Olympus Rants
>
> I think you are being fooled by differences in the scale of the images
> (the film image is larger and framed more tightly), the change in
> lighting, and the contrast of the images(the dark glass in the
> background buildings is black in the film shot). All those
> inconsistencies in taking the comparison pictures contribute to the
> relative flatness of the digital image. Reichmann was primarily
> talking about resolution of details in a modestly sized print. To use
> his test for something else is probably a mistake.
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, CA
> USA
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|