Let me steer this thread back to where it started. I was more than a
little surprised that whomever you're trying to sell to can apparently
tell the difference between a 5 and 10 MP image. Or can they?
Are you sending them 5MP images with 5MP Oly EXIF data or are you
sending them ressed-up 10MP images sans EXIF? Are you telling me the
folks who buy this stuff can tell the difference by looking at the
ressed-up image? That they can see "interpolation artifacts"? I guess
maybe they can. The difference between 5 and 10MP is a 40% resolution
increase. But I didn't think the editors were that smart or observant.
And maybe all you really need is a better RIP.
So, what's the right interpretation?
Chuck Norcutt
AG Schnozz wrote:
> Ok, maybe I need to beg forgiveness for trash-talking Olympus
> these past few days. I would hope that you all understand that
> this is out of supreme frustration with my current situation.
>
> I'm not a hobbyist. Photography is an "interest" but also a
> "business". Cameras, such as the OM-2S and E-1 satisfy most of
> my "interest" side quite well, and for *MOST* of my business
> side too.
>
> However, I am losing money here. I'm running into restrictions
> with stock agencies and for high-detail art shots, I have a
> maximum print-size I can go up to with 5MP. A year ago, 11x14
> was an acceptable "large" print. Nowadays, 20x30" is. The
> average sale prices haven't necessarily gone up, but the
> quantity of sales of the smaller prints have gone down. The
> price I got for an 11x14 two years ago is now the average price
> for a print with double the surface area. Smaller 5x7 sized art
> prints (with big matting) are still the same, and any camera
> will suffice.
>
> The Canon 5D has completely changed the "landscape" here. In
> the stock world, I'm now competing against these. The 20D/30D
> with 8MP is now no longer acceptable. What totally flipped me
> out this week was getting a rejection on over 125 images which
> were carefully worked to get absolutely the best quality on.
> The total time-loss on these images was around two man-weeks.
> They were not rejected for any reason other than "interpolation
> artifacts" and "lack of clarity/detail". Previous submittions
> with lesser quality were easily accepted, but no more. When I
> inquired about it, I was told that they were no longer going to
> accept any images taken with a camera less than 10MP.
>
> Now, YOU TELL ME what I'm supposed to do? If this is a source
> of income required to buy food, it pretty much defines my
> minimum equipment needs.
>
> I've been eyeballing used 1Ds cameras. I've considered getting a
> loan for a 5D. I've even considered bailing totally out of my
> current equipment and going Nikon. However, I choose to keep my
> business as close to debt free as possible as I already have too
> many other debts to worry about. I know, run the numbers... I
> am, and I might have to bite the bullet, however, I can't until
> after taking care of $70,000 in other business purchases.
>
> Olympus announces the E-400. A camera that *could* meet my
> needs for the 20% of the business which I need the extra
> resolution for, but doesn't have to be an ergonomic masterpiece.
> I get all excited because it's also relatively affordable. Then
> the announcement that they'll not be making it available in the
> USA. "Livid" doesn't even come close to expressing how I felt.
>
> Olympus shows a block of wood. Not unexpected, but then the
> unofficial-official statement that sometime in 2007, probably
> late, is made. Ok, for the E-1 replacement, I can handle that,
> but what am I supposed to do between now and then? Khen says
> "sooner", but there is no promise.
>
> When compared to the 8MP cameras, my E-1 could hold its
> own--because of user-technique and workflow. But, 10MP is a
> much bigger dragon to slay. I was hoping that my images would
> all slide through this time, but these didn't. Not only did I
> lose two-weeks of productivity, but I lost the revenue those
> images would have generated. A double-whammy.
>
> As a professional photographer, I'm required to have the tools
> needed to handle the market demands. Olympus "claims" to have
> an interest in serving the professional, but without a valid
> tool, this is just so much noise on their part. I don't need
> something in late-2007, I need to start shooting stuff with
> 10MP+ now. Unless I buy a Canon, I'm stuck with shooting film.
>
> This is my story, and why I'm ranting.
>
> AG
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|