I think this is a camera that should have had a much larger sensor. The
diagonal on a 1/2.5" sensor is only about 7mm. Pretty tiny pixels and
the noise tests show it.
Chuck Norcutt
Rob Harrison wrote:
> On 9/26/06 11:24 AM, "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>I find the camera
>>data base on pbase.com is really good to see how successful ordinary
>>people are in getting good pix with their cameras.
>
>
> I've been looking there as well, for exactly the same reason. Of course, the
> results (like any sample) may be skewed by the type of folks that buy a
> particular camera. I've been incredibly impressed, for example, by the GR-D
> images I've seen there--but that could be because the people that buy it are
> better photographers.... Great images though, and along with Sean Reid's
> review, has me considering the GR-D despite its pan on dpreview.
>
> Rob in Seattle
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|