See my previous post about incorrect math/geometry here on the image
circle. I posted the note on high quality EVF's. Most of the camera
EVF's are made by a small company in Taunton, Massachusetts about 40
miles south of me. Over a year ago they claimed to have a 1024x??? EVF
but it sure hasn't appeared in any product. 1024x768 would be as good
as many people's monitor screens. Resolution wise anyhow. Don't know
about dynamic range and contrast.
Chuck Norcutt
Bill Pearce wrote:
>>1. When will the digi-crew realise that 35mm lenses are made to cover a
>>43mm circle and provide
>>a camera with a 43x43 sensor? This sensor would have 114% more surface
>>area and approach
>>the quality possible with a 645 camera but be able to use 35mm system
>>lenses.
>
> A superb idea. As some of you may remember, most all of my professional work
> is on 2 1/4 square, now that there is basically no requirement for slides.
> In the world of published photos, the common sizes (8x10, etc.) are of no
> concern. The square offers the most cropping options.
>
>
>>2. If you have an electronic viewfinder, the flange to sensor distance can
>>be arbitrarily small.
>
> someone posted a link to a company on the east coast that makes high quality
> EVF's Will we ever see these in a camera? With the transition to slr's, I
> don't think so.
> Why
>
>>hasn't someone made a body with a large sensor and a set of
>>interchangeable flanges which can
>>accommodate almost any 35mm system lens, from Leica/Contax to ... If smart
>>enough, the
>>flanges could even support auto exposure and auto focus lenses from
>>various makers.
>
> No body wants to give up the sales of dedicated lenses. Witness the Canon
> and Nikonmove to cheap kit lenses.
>
> Bill Pearce
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|