> khen lim <castanet.xiosnetworks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> I am shocked. I did not know this could ever be the case. There has to
> be a
> reason for this although I won't even begin to know what it is.
>
Maybe it will be sold in the USofA under a different name E-Amp, E-Ohm,
E-Farad, E-400Q ?
Perhaps they don't consider it good enough for the USofA, they'll have to wait
for the E-2, E-3, E-4 ?
...Wayne
Wayne Harridge
http://lrh.structuregraphs.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|