Subject: | [OM] Re: E-400 on dpreview |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:37:29 -0400 |
Saving money since you probably shouldn't use the camera connection. I never download from the camera even though it has USB 2.0. It's still much slower than my SanDisk reader which hits close to 9MB/sec reading SanDisk Ultra II CF cards. Costs $20 from B&H. Chuck Norcutt Johan Malmstrom wrote: > But pleeeeaaaase! > > Still USB 1.1, what are they thinking. > > / Johan > 14 sep 2006 kl. 10.08 skrev Mike Lees: > > >>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091401olympuse400.asp >> >>Mike. >> >>============================================== >>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com >>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx >>============================================== > > > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: E-400 on dpreview, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OM-32 flash question, Marten Beels |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-400 on dpreview, Johan Malmstrom |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-400 on dpreview, AG Schnozz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |