I think this comment again reflects one of my earlier statements that you can
use a shoebox for a picture but need an exceptional lens to do it with, (but
what do I know, other than I love the high end Zuiko lenses)
Originally I thought the E-1 was the camera of choice, but later i learned the
300 mm F:2.8 and the 7-14 F:4 lenses were the best available... its not about
the camera, its the lens.. that is the moneymaker..
( saving my toonies)
Cheers.. Tim
Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why would you need a pro Canon? They all have low noise, not just the
full frame ones.
I am reminded that I was lusting after a particular lens one time
that was not available for my OM and someone said to get the lens you
need and put the least expensive version of the camera that works
with it. In this case why not get a really low noise at high ISO
camera and the lens you would use and just use it for that purpose.
Winsor
Long Beach, CA
USA
On Sep 13, 2006, at 3:38 PM, Paul Braun wrote:
> I just can't handle the price of entry into
> Pro Can*n Land.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|