You didn't read my response carefully which says: "... I've just looked
it up and see that they [HP] do offer pigmented inks now."
Chuck Norcutt
khen lim wrote:
> I believe you might not be comparing apples with apples here. Epson uses
> pigment-based printing technology whereas HP is into dye printing if I'm not
> mistaken. Canon is like HP.
>>From what i've read, pigment might not be as good in terms of colours and
> sharpness - oh yes, I might be wrong here.... - but its archival properties
> are better.
>
> K.
>
> On 08/09/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>I've used only Epson for the last couple of years. I have a little
>>Epson desktop at home and access to a big one (24") in a friend's
>>studio. Don't know how HP is doing although I've just looked it up and
>>see that they do offer pigmented inks now. From all I've read here and
>>elsewhere though I'd only buy Epson or Canon.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|