I believe you might not be comparing apples with apples here. Epson uses
pigment-based printing technology whereas HP is into dye printing if I'm not
mistaken. Canon is like HP.
>From what i've read, pigment might not be as good in terms of colours and
sharpness - oh yes, I might be wrong here.... - but its archival properties
are better.
K.
On 08/09/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've used only Epson for the last couple of years. I have a little
> Epson desktop at home and access to a big one (24") in a friend's
> studio. Don't know how HP is doing although I've just looked it up and
> see that they do offer pigmented inks now. From all I've read here and
> elsewhere though I'd only buy Epson or Canon.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Ali Shah wrote:
>
> > I have printed a couple of pix on an Epson with their
> > new durabrite inks and Espon photo paper. Do you know
> > how that stacks up against HP?
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
--
Khen Lim
XIOS Network Solutions
IBM Business Partner
+60 +16 528 6010 / 016 528 6010
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|