Subject: | [OM] Re: Next E-x? |
---|---|
From: | "khen lim" <castanet.xiosnetworks@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:04:49 +0800 |
Hahahaha!!! On 31/08/06, Ali Shah <alizookoman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > God - imagine what could have been had Olympus's board > approved the OM-5! > > What is with the "Evolt" in the newer E-XXX dslr > lineup? FYI, the E-Volt symbologue is only for North American markets.....thank God it's not over here or in Europe Naming conventions boggle the mind sometimes. Pentax > realized that they made a major mistake by naming > their digital SLR offerings "*ist". Pentax has gone > back to the "K" knowing well that it will bring > memories of the inspiring K1000. They say the K100d is > just that - a very simple down-to-earth designed dslr > camera. I believe that Pentax WILL continue to use the *ist (supposed to be STARIST) symbologue for their higher-end cameras. The K prefix is a deliberate marketing move to invoke memories of the K1000 - you're spot on there, Ali. Olympus could use a knock in the head! I'll let Shinju-ku know that....! ;D __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > -- Khen Lim XIOS Network Solutions IBM Business Partner +60 +16 528 6010 / 016 528 6010 ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Next E-x?, Ali Shah |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Next E-x?, LostKase |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Next E-x?, Ali Shah |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Next E-x?, Ali Shah |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |