I'm not crazy about the E-330's viewfinder, but it's perfectly serviceable, and
any shortcomings in that regard are more than made up for by that big ol' flip
'n flop LCD. The E-1, with a KatzEye screen, while not quite providing the
equal of the view through an OM-1, works perfectly fine for me. I'm a
natural-born griper and complainer, but I don't have any problem with what I
see looking through the E-1 viewfinder whether manually focusing old Zuikos or
shooting with the DZs. It's just not an issue for me.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx>
> > I am sure Moose will explain it better, but you are ignoring
> > the major difference between manual focusing with the E-1 and
> > the 5D, the size of the mirror and the large, bright image in
> > the 5D viewfinder because it is full frame.
>
> There you go, spoiling my world with facts, again.
>
> Hmm. If this was the determining factor, you'd think that
> medium-format SLRs should have had really bloody bright
> viewfinders.
>
> AG
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|