The E-1 and E-330 together do everything I want or need, since I don't make
giant prints and am so good I never need to crop. (Yeah, right! I wish.) But
the truth is, with the two bodies, 7-14, 14-54, 50-200 and 50 macro DZ lenses,
extension tube, 1.4X TC, FL-50, FC-1 with ring and twin flashes, plus
miscellaneous doo-dads, I'm much too heavily invested to change horses here in
deep and expensive midstream. I'm so satisfied with what I've got that I really
actually probably honestly don't need the E-3. But what's that got to do with
anything?
Walt, looking forward to September: Murkin football and (hopefully) the
fabulous E-3
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: ALI <oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I didnt mean to start anything. I believe the E-1 is still a respectable
> well-built camera. Will be a good backup for the E-500...since I dont have to
> purchase new lenses, etc etc.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|