Have you asked him about it?
It may just be a numbers game. I have no idea what the percentage
break-out is, but assume APS-C size sensor cams represent the majority
of dSLRs in people's hands.
In any case, a well reasoned email may encourage him to include FF sensors.
ScottGee1
On 7/24/06, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ScottGee1 wrote:
> > Klaus now runs:
> >
> > http://www.photozone.de/
> >
> > I'm the one who used to feed him results from the U.S. based
> > publications that were difficult to get in Europe. Very pleasant
> > fellow.
> >
> A good and useful site in many ways. But how he could spend so may hours
> testing so many full frame EF mount lenses from Can*n and others on an
> APS-C size sensor is beyond me. It also drives me crazy. All these
> careful, standardized tests of a whole range of interesting glass, but
> useless in evaluating glass for the FF sensors.
>
> If a lens is poor in the center, or on the edges of the small sensor,
> one could assume that means it just gets worse as it gets farther out.
> However, there are a few careful tests that reveal lenses where
> sharpness does not simply decline with distance from the center of the
> frame. Particularly true, it appears, of super wides.
>
> It's sort of as if Gary did all his OM mount lens tests on a Pen-F.
>
> Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|