Yeah, and they make absolutely lousy images to boot! I don't think I'll
mount another one on the camera.
Chuck Norcutt
ScottGee1 wrote:
> $15.00??
>
> I've had sandwiches that cost about that much!
>
> ScottGee1
>
>
> On 7/20/06, usher99@xxxxxxx <usher99@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Thanks all. I did check Gary's site and did not know how closely
>> the 28 f2.8 performance mirrored the 28 f2. I am armed to the
>> teeth with info. Looks likely sharper in the corners than my zoom
>> and probably worth having and changing lenses for that fl for
>> $15.00 assuming it doesn't require servicing. I'll carefully check
>> the diaphragm given Chuck's valuable comments. He also has a OM
>> 2N, Z. 75-150, Z. 50mm F1.4 ?sn, 50mm 3.5 Macro. I'll take a look
>> if anyone's interested. I had sent the judge Walt's "born again"
>> (sans name) to no avail. I was hoping for a box full of Fangs-- 21
>> F2, Tamron 400 f4, 4Ti etc ;-( Mike
>
>
> ============================================== List usage info:
> http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies:
> olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|